In India, Torture by Police
Is Frequent and Often Deadly
MEERUT,
India -- Rajeev Sharma, a young electrician, was sleeping when
police barged into his house a month ago and dragged him out of
bed on suspicion of a burglary in the neighborhood, his family
recalled.
When
his young wife and brother protested, the police, who did not
show them an arrest warrant, said they were taking Sharma to the
police station for "routine questioning."
"Little
did we know that we would lose him forever," said Sunil Sharma,
Rajeev's brother, recounting how he died while in police custody.
"Their routine questioning proved fatal," he added,
sitting beside his brother's grieving widow.
Rajeev
Sharma, 28, died at the police station within a day of his detention.
Police said he
committed suicide, but his family charges that he was beaten and
killed.
The
case highlights the frequent use of torture and deadly force at
local police stations in India, a practice decried by human rights
activists and the Indian Supreme Court. A little more than a decade
after Parliament established the National Human RightsCommission
to deal with such abuses, police torture continues unabated, according
to human rights groups and the Supreme Court. According to the
latest available government data, there were 1,307 reported deaths
in police and judicial custody in India in 2002.
"India
has the highest number of cases of police torture and custodial
deaths among the world's democracies and the weakest law against
torture," said Ravi Nair, who heads the South Asia Human
Rights Documentation Center. "The police often operate in
a climate of impunity, where torture is seen as routine police
behavior to extract confessions from small pickpockets to political
suspects." He said that laws governing police functions were
framed under British colonial rule in 1861 "as an oppressive
force designed to keep the population under control."
Police
records show that, two weeks before his detention, Rajeev Sharma
made a electrician's service call at the home of a wealthy businessman.
On that day, the man reported that $500 worth of gold jewelry
and about $100 in cash were missing, police said.
After
Sharma's detention, his brother called the police station and
was told that Sharma had confessed to the theft, he said. The
brother said he and other family members rushed to the station
and were able to see Sharma briefly.
"His
eyes were red, his mouth was bleeding and he could hardly walk.
They had beaten him very badly. That was the last glimpse we had,"
said Sunil Sharma, 35. "By the evening, the police informed
us that he had committed suicide in the lockup by hanging himself
with a blanket. The suicide story is a coverup; my brother died
of police torture."
The
death in police custody sparked two days of rioting and protests
in Meerut, about 45 miles from New Delhi, in the northern state
of Uttar Pradesh. Angry residents surrounded and threw stones
at the police station, burned police vehicles and blocked traffic.
Thousands
participated in Sharma's funeral procession; protesters demanded
an open inquest by a panel of physicians and the immediate arrests
of those responsible. Police conducted an autopsy in private,
lawyers close to the case said. But authorities did issue arrest
warrants for the man who said he had been robbed and for six police
officers, an apparent reaction to the unusual popular outcry,
family members and lawyers said. The merchant is in jail, alleged
to have participated in beating Sharma, but the police officers
apparently have fled, authorities said.
Although
the Indian government signed the international Convention Against
Torture in 1997, it has not ratified the document. Some members
of Parliament have argued against ratification, saying they oppose
international scrutiny and asserting that Indian laws have adequate
provisions to prevent torture. Human rights advocates said Uttar
Pradesh ranks highest among Indian states in the incidence of
police torture and custodial deaths.
Some
police officers justify the use of torture to extract confessions
and instill fear.
"The police in India are under tremendous pressure, as people
need quick results. So we have to pick up and interrogate a lot
of people. Sometimes things get out of control," said Raghuraj
Singh Chauhan, a newly assigned officer at the station where Rajeev
Sharma died. "After all, confessions cannot be extracted
with love. The fear of the police has to be kept alive -- how
else would you reduce crime?" he added, fanning himself with
a police file folder.
A
senior police officer in Meerut, on condition of anonymity, openly
discussed torture methods with a visiting reporter. One technique,
he said, involves a two-foot-long rubber belt attached to a wooden
handle.
"We
call this thing samaj sudharak," the officer said, smiling,
using the Hindi phrase for social reformer. "When we hit
with this, there are no fractures, no blood, no major peeling
of the skin. It is safe for us, as nothing shows up in the postmortem
report. But the pain is such that the person can only appeal to
God. He will confess to anything."
Last
September, in a written ruling in a case of police misconduct,
the Supreme Court criticized the use of torture. "The dehumanizing
torture, assault and death in custody which have assumed alarming
proportions raise serious questions about the credibility of the
rule of law and administration of the criminal justice system,"
the court said. "The cry for justice becomes louder and warrants
immediate remedial measure."
In
addition, the severity of the torture problem is probably worse
than statistics indicate, because victims, fearing reprisals,
rarely report cases against the police, human rights advocates
said.
"About
40 percent of custodial torture cases are not even reported. They
are just grateful for God's mercy that they are alive and free,"
said Pradeep Kumar, a human rights lawyer who has represented
police torture victims in Uttar Pradesh. "Torture sometimes
leads to permanent disability, psychological trauma, loss of faculties."
The
National Human Rights Commission, led by a retired Supreme Court
justice, has faced criticism that it is too dependent on the government
and lacks enforcement power.
"We have not been able to build a human rights culture in
the police force," said Shankar Sen, a former police officer
and an ex-member of the commission. "It is not only individual
aberration but a matter of systemic failure."
The
commission has ordered that cameras be installed in police stations
to monitor and deter police brutality.
"In
the past year we have spent about $600,000 to equip most of the
police stations in New Delhi with a camera. This will make police
functioning transparent and have a big impact on torture,"
said Maxwell Pereira, a senior police official in the capital.
But
critics and families of victims said they had not seen changes.
In a much-publicized case in New Delhi last fall, five policemen
were charged with beating and killing Sushil Kumar Nama at a police
station.
Nama
had been detained on suspicion that he was working with neighborhood
gamblers. Four of the police officers were arrested in April,
but one remains at large, authorities said. Police officials denied
that Nama was tortured, saying he died of a heart attack after
he was released from custody.
"My
two children are so traumatized that now they run home scared
every time they see a policeman on the street," said Nama's
wife, Rekha, 29. "They know that danger lurks behind that
uniform. They are not policemen, they are wolves."
<<
Back
TOP
||
Profile | Achievements | Awards||
|| Press Clipping | Publications
| Photo Gallery ||
||I
Believe |Guest
Book | E-mail |
Home ||
|